This site is part of the Global Exhibitions Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067.

Informa

Multi-Story Case Study: Tri-Village Self Storage in Columbus, OH

Comments
Print

Demand for self-storage is growing, and storage properties are growing up! Tri-Village Self Storage elevated the downtown Columbus, Ohio, market—literally and figuratively—when it opened the first phase of its six-story facility in 2015. Here’s the story behind the development of this multi-story, state-of-the-art project.

Overcoming Obstacles

Though it had real potential, this untapped market came with many obstacles. Downtown Columbus has limited space for new construction. The tract for this new property was among occupied structures and three busy city streets, which made it complex to build.

“We knew building a downtown project was going to present many challenges, from staging material to erecting the structure and underground utilities,” says Joseph Beatty, vice president of Tri-Village, which operates another storage facility in Columbus and has five other projects in the development phase. “The project consists of an existing 0.282-acre surface parking lot with the building designed from property line to property line, with no room for error.”

Brexton LLC, the commercial real estate development and construction firm that built the project, negotiated a lease with a neighbor for staging and storing the building materials on its parking lot. “In addition to the 12-month lease, we agreed to replace the entire asphalt lot and concrete approach to the lot upon completion,” Beatty says. This was a win-win scenario, as it allowed Brexton to erect a large portion of the storage facility from the adjacent lot.

Tri-Village Self-Storage Property Details***Obtaining permits, on the other hand, was more problematic. “The building official was ready to release our permit, but the division of public service was concerned about traffic on one of the side streets,” Beatty says. “The concern was excess vehicle weight, so they refused to release their approval without us taking core samples of the street to assure proper pavement depth. The cores ultimately provided more than sufficient depth.”

Shortly after site demolition, while preparing to install the shoring for the lower-level construction, Brexton discovered that a high-pressure gas line was five feet closer to the building than originally expected. This miscalculation required the team to redesign to a smaller amenity.

In addition, construction crews worked through history-making rainfall, as it rained 29 of 30 days in June. Three temporary, six-inch pumps had to be installed to remove the rainwater from the facility’s lower level before they could place the concrete mat foundation.

Finally, the crews were required to provide daily communication about the project’s status. “Along with daily activity logs, we recorded nearly 3,500 still photographs and 30 hours of drone video to communicate progress daily to the owner and lender,” Beatty says.

Blending In

The downtown commission played a role when it came to the building’s aesthetics. The structure needed to look like an office building, with ample windows. “The market’s changed. Storage is now in industrial places and flood zones, and is now leaning toward the more upscale,” says George Harvey, facility manager. “We took it to a whole new level at our downtown location, and that high standard is really the expectation.”

Columbus also happens to be in a growth stage, with an abundance of large apartment and condo complexes. One of the overall goals of the project was to deliver a safe, well-lit, highly automated, secure location, Harvey says. “Price is the last thing that our tenants who move in here are worried about. When they walk in, they’re absolutely in awe. They know this isn’t your standard self-storage place.”

« Previous12Next »
Comments
comments powered by Disqus