This site is part of the Global Exhibitions Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067.


Getting the Most Out of a Self-Storage Feasibility Study

Jeffrey Supnick Comments
Continued from page 1

A phasing plan also works for developers that want to build all at once. For example, they can build a “shell” and leave a portion of the rental spaces’ doors and partitions undeveloped for future configuration.

Make sure the initial phase of the development has a varied unit mix. If all or most of your 5-by-5 or 10-by-30 units are in the second phase, you will be turning away customers for those sizes until you move to your next phase. The phasing plan should also consider how you can complete the subsequent phases without disruption to facility operations with future construction activities.

A Financial Pro Forma

Completing a financial pro forma that shows a great investment yield is a great experience; however, yields on paper do not pay the bills. If a large percentage of your space never gets rented it may have been better to build a smaller facility more tailored to the market. Planning your facility in a way that perhaps does not look as good on paper but has a real opportunity to produce solid results is where you need to be.

Some developers look at site design from the standpoint of how they can get the most rentable square footage as well as the most dollars per square foot in rent without paying enough attention to the customer experience. Often this approach results in poor unit mixes and facilities lacking amenities that draw customers.

Some operators fail to see how vacancies are a direct consequence of inappropriate unit mixes and poor accessibility to units. In other words, vacancy problems can be explained by having too few or too many of a particular rental space size.

Multi-story facilities may also have to compromise on unit mix since it can be difficult to rent hard-to-reach units not on the ground floor or with drive-up access. If you do proceed with a multi-story project carefully consider how your building and space plan allows for customer loading zones and elevator accessibility.

Consider creating two financial pro formas: one with a development scenario for single-story construction; the other for multi-story construction. Some developers have found multi-story facilities are actually less financially advantageous in certain instances because they have higher construction costs per square foot and may require discounted rents to attract tenants to rent units above ground level. Building wider single-story buildings as an alternative and getting a high concentration of building footprint on the ground level provides the developer with an opportunity to create interior spaces with climate control.

With all that’s at stake, it pays to engage the services of an experienced self-storage consultant to look at your project from many different points of view and provide an objective assessment to enable you to succeed in the real world. The feasibility study is your foundation. Make it a strong one.

Jeffrey Supnick is president of Supnick Real Estate Co. and is a 25-year veteran of the self-storage industry. During his career, Supnick has been responsible for the development of more than 30 self-storage sites. Supnick Real Estate Co. is a full-service firm devoted exclusively to self-storage brokerage, feasibility studies, consulting and property management services. For more information, call 856.722.1414; e-mail; visit

Related Articles:

Some Thoughts on Feasibilities [Discussion Thread]

Self-Storage Feasibility Boils Down to Site Quality, Market Dynamics and Financial Performance

Feasibility Studies : Choosing a firm, what to pay, what to expect

« Previous12Next »
comments powered by Disqus